will, I think, reshape and transform the balance of the separation of powers."īut, Justice Neil Gorsuch, noting that Congress and the president are co-equal branches of government, asked: "Why should we not defer to the House's view of its own legislative purposes?"ĭouglas Letter, the lawyer for the House of Representatives, defended the congressional subpoenas, saying they were related to the House's ability to legislate on a variety of subjects. Wall contended that the congressional justification for the subpoenas was "paper thin." Ultimately, Wall argued, that "the power that seeking. The House Oversight Committee was looking at tightening ethics restrictions in the future to deal with a president who, like this one, has huge business interests that overlap with the government.ĭeputy Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall was up next representing the Trump administration's view. The House Intelligence Committee wanted to look at potential foreign influence over the president, while the Financial Services Committee was trying to see if money laundering restrictions need to be tightened to prevent foreign influence in U.S. ![]() Three House committees are involved in the congressional subpoenas for Trump's financial records. The cases test whether some of the president's financial records prior to becoming president are immune to subpoenas, except during an impeachment proceeding. Supreme Court on Tuesday in cases that pit President Trump against the power of Congress and a New York grand jury. There were historic arguments at the U.S. ![]() President Trump's pre-presidential financial records were the subject of Tuesday's arguments before the Supreme Court.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |